Skip to main content

New Study on CBPL Feasibility

The study confirms that it is feasible to pilot outcomes based contracting for certain types of curriculum-based professional learning, with mutual interest from both districts and professional learning providers

Related Posts

  • 3 Takeaways on Tutoring From the Accelerate Convening

    3 Takeaways on Tutoring From the Accelerate Convening

    Tutoring works best when implementation works. This blog shares three key takeaways from the recent Accelerate convening, connecting research on dosage, instructional alignment, and participation to the Standards of Excellence for Outcomes Based Contracting™: High-Dosage Tutoring. The takeaway is practical: districts can turn evidence into clear expectations, stronger partnerships, and…

  • The Design Gap: Why ‘Good Enough’ Consumer Tech Isn’t Good Enough For Schools

    The Design Gap: Why ‘Good Enough’ Consumer Tech Isn’t Good Enough For Schools

    In this Forbes Nonprofit Council article, Erin Mote examines the growing divide between consumer AI tools and technology designed for learning. The piece highlights why districts need stronger procurement practices and why the Standards of Excellence for Outcomes Based Contracting™ matter when evaluating tools for implementation, evidence, and measurable…

  • Outcomes-Based Contracts: Centering Learning on Continuous Student Growth

    Outcomes-Based Contracts: Centering Learning on Continuous Student Growth

    In outcomes based contracting in education, districts and providers share accountability for student results. This EdWeb article explains how tying payment to measurable learning goals changes provider relationships, strengthens implementation, and helps schools sustain interventions beyond short-term funding cycles. Read More…