Skip to main content

Should Districts Pay Vendors Based on Student Outcomes? What the Research Says

in News 1 min read

In this Education Week article, assistant editor Alyson Klein examines whether districts should tie provider payments to student outcomes, drawing on a new WestEd evaluation commissioned by the Center for Outcomes Based Contracting (OBC) across eight districts in California, Florida, Mississippi and Texas. One district leader credits close, ongoing communication with providers for a smooth partnership, while a provider interviewed points to the financial risk of factors outside its control.

Related Posts

  • Us Dept of Education location

    Can a Letter From Washington Actually Change How Schools Buy Technology?

    Dr. Brittany Miller joins EdSurge to unpack new federal edtech guidance urging schools to buy for outcomes, not screen time.

  • Proof Points: Paying Vendors for Student Results

    Proof Points: Paying Vendors for Student Results

    New WestEd research finds early promise for outcomes based contracting, but can't yet separate contract effects from coaching support.

  • Accountability Works. Outcomes-Based Contracting Makes It Work Better

    Accountability Works. Outcomes-Based Contracting Makes It Work Better

    Former Newark superintendent Chris Cerf argues outcomes based contracting gives accountability a more durable path forward.