Skip to main content

Three Lessons School Districts Have Learned About Contracting for Results

Schools spend billions of dollars a year on products and services, including everything from staplers and textbooks to teacher coaching and training. Does any of it help students learn more?

Related Posts

  • 3 Takeaways on Tutoring From the Accelerate Convening

    3 Takeaways on Tutoring From the Accelerate Convening

    Tutoring works best when implementation works. This blog shares three key takeaways from the recent Accelerate convening, connecting research on dosage, instructional alignment, and participation to the Standards of Excellence for Outcomes Based Contracting™: High-Dosage Tutoring. The takeaway is practical: districts can turn evidence into clear expectations, stronger partnerships, and…

  • The Design Gap: Why ‘Good Enough’ Consumer Tech Isn’t Good Enough For Schools

    The Design Gap: Why ‘Good Enough’ Consumer Tech Isn’t Good Enough For Schools

    In this Forbes Nonprofit Council article, Erin Mote examines the growing divide between consumer AI tools and technology designed for learning. The piece highlights why districts need stronger procurement practices and why the Standards of Excellence for Outcomes Based Contracting™ matter when evaluating tools for implementation, evidence, and measurable…

  • Outcomes-Based Contracts: Centering Learning on Continuous Student Growth

    Outcomes-Based Contracts: Centering Learning on Continuous Student Growth

    In outcomes based contracting in education, districts and providers share accountability for student results. This EdWeb article explains how tying payment to measurable learning goals changes provider relationships, strengthens implementation, and helps schools sustain interventions beyond short-term funding cycles. Read More…