Skip to main content

Proof Points: Paying Vendors for Student Results

in News 1 min read

August 10, 2026

In this Hechinger Report “Proof Points” column, staff writer Jill Barshay examines the first independent evaluation of outcomes based contracting, a WestEd study of eight early-adopter districts in California, Florida, Mississippi and Texas. The evaluation found measurable gains in three of four rigorously analyzed interventions, but couldn’t isolate whether the contracts or the coaching from the Center for Outcomes Based Contracting (OBC) drove the results, according to WestEd’s Sean Tanner and OBC’s Brittany Miller.

Related Posts

  • Should Districts Pay Vendors Based on Student Outcomes? What the Research Says

    Should Districts Pay Vendors Based on Student Outcomes? What the Research Says

    New WestEd research on outcomes based contracting weighs the promise and the pitfalls of paying providers for student results.

  • Accountability Works. Outcomes-Based Contracting Makes It Work Better

    Accountability Works. Outcomes-Based Contracting Makes It Work Better

    Former Newark superintendent Chris Cerf argues outcomes based contracting gives accountability a more durable path forward.

  • Early Evidence Finds Outcomes Based Contracting Boosts Student Performance

    Early Evidence Finds Outcomes Based Contracting Boosts Student Performance

    New WestEd research finds outcomes based contracting boosts student performance in early-adopter districts — at costs comparable to traditional contracts.