Skip to main content

For Results, Schools Need Outcome-Based Contracting

in News 1 min read

By Sunil Gunderia, GovTec

Writing for GovTech, Sunil Gunderia, chief innovation officer at Age of Learning, makes the provider’s case for outcomes based contracting as a response to declining math and reading proficiency. Gunderia outlines four steps for districts getting started: defining outcomes and metrics, structuring performance-based payments, writing clear RFPs, and establishing mutual accountability. The piece traces the model’s origins to research at Harvard and Stanford and highlights how the Southern Education Foundation created the Center for Outcomes Based Contracting to help districts adopt the approach at scale and align education investments with measurable student results.

Related Posts

  • Proof Points: Paying Vendors for Student Results

    Proof Points: Paying Vendors for Student Results

    New WestEd research finds early promise for outcomes based contracting, but can't yet separate contract effects from coaching support.

  • Should Districts Pay Vendors Based on Student Outcomes? What the Research Says

    Should Districts Pay Vendors Based on Student Outcomes? What the Research Says

    New WestEd research on outcomes based contracting weighs the promise and the pitfalls of paying providers for student results.

  • Accountability Works. Outcomes-Based Contracting Makes It Work Better

    Accountability Works. Outcomes-Based Contracting Makes It Work Better

    Former Newark superintendent Chris Cerf argues outcomes based contracting gives accountability a more durable path forward.