Skip to main content

Outcomes-based contracting is a big shift for the edtech world

in News 1 min read

In a new opinion piece for District Administration, Coursemojo co-founder and co-CEO Dacia Toll writes that edtech is facing an overdue reckoning, and that outcomes based contracting is the most promising path forward. Drawing on more than 20 years as a teacher, principal, and school system leader, Toll describes how tying provider payment to student outcomes changes the conversation from “What can this tool do?” to “Is this tool actually helping us achieve our goals?” The piece cites the Center for Outcomes Based Contracting’s guidance that at least 40% of provider payment should be contingent on student outcomes, and highlights the Center’s Jasmine Walker on how these agreements build cross-functional collaboration across curriculum, procurement, finance, and school leadership teams.

Related Posts

  • Proof Points: Paying Vendors for Student Results

    Proof Points: Paying Vendors for Student Results

    New WestEd research finds early promise for outcomes based contracting, but can't yet separate contract effects from coaching support.

  • Should Districts Pay Vendors Based on Student Outcomes? What the Research Says

    Should Districts Pay Vendors Based on Student Outcomes? What the Research Says

    New WestEd research on outcomes based contracting weighs the promise and the pitfalls of paying providers for student results.

  • Accountability Works. Outcomes-Based Contracting Makes It Work Better

    Accountability Works. Outcomes-Based Contracting Makes It Work Better

    Former Newark superintendent Chris Cerf argues outcomes based contracting gives accountability a more durable path forward.