In this Government Technology article, Julia Gilban-Cohen examines what outcomes based contracting for edtech actually changes in practice, drawing on findings from the Digital Promise report. Rather than framing OBC as a money-back guarantee, the piece explores how the model creates mutual accountability between districts and vendors, encourages districts to define who a tool is for before purchasing it, and builds the implementation infrastructure that makes edtech efficacy testable in the first place. The result: fewer tools, more intentional use, and classrooms where students can articulate exactly why they are using a product and what they are working to improve.
Beyond the Buzz: What Outcomes Based Contracting Actually Changes in Edtech
Related Posts
-
August 10, 2026 | News
Proof Points: Paying Vendors for Student Results
New WestEd research finds early promise for outcomes based contracting, but can't yet separate contract effects from coaching support.
-
August 6, 2026 | News
Should Districts Pay Vendors Based on Student Outcomes? What the Research Says
New WestEd research on outcomes based contracting weighs the promise and the pitfalls of paying providers for student results.
-
August 6, 2026 | News
Accountability Works. Outcomes-Based Contracting Makes It Work Better
Former Newark superintendent Chris Cerf argues outcomes based contracting gives accountability a more durable path forward.
