Skip to main content

Outcomes Based Contracting Requires Not Just Accountability, but Partnership

in News 1 min read

September 11, 2026

Writing in The 74, Kelly Sia, CEO of Curriculum Associates, makes the case that outcomes based contracting works best when districts and providers treat it as a shared-responsibility partnership rather than a pay-for-performance mechanism alone. Drawing on an outcomes based contract with Fresno Unified School District and a new independent WestEd evaluation, Sia outlines five lessons for the field, from setting ambitious but realistic targets to treating professional learning as essential. The piece credits the Center for Outcomes Based Contracting (OBC) with establishing the national framework that brings districts and providers together, a partnership model the Center anchors in the Standards of Excellence for Outcomes Based Contracting™ and its mutual accountability domain.

Related Posts

  • Us Dept of Education location

    Can a Letter From Washington Actually Change How Schools Buy Technology?

    Dr. Brittany Miller joins EdSurge to unpack new federal edtech guidance urging schools to buy for outcomes, not screen time.

  • Proof Points: Paying Vendors for Student Results

    Proof Points: Paying Vendors for Student Results

    New WestEd research finds early promise for outcomes based contracting, but can't yet separate contract effects from coaching support.

  • Should Districts Pay Vendors Based on Student Outcomes? What the Research Says

    Should Districts Pay Vendors Based on Student Outcomes? What the Research Says

    New WestEd research on outcomes based contracting weighs the promise and the pitfalls of paying providers for student results.